Clearance Level: BlueTwo fish, one fish…no fish?

Most of us haven't anything more than a hazy perception of what happens in the other 3/4 of the planet's surface.

1 of 1 pages

I first read about this in an article "The Top News Stories You Didn't See in 2006," published in a local newspaper.

Apparently, several factors have greatly reduced the diversity and stability of ocean ecosystems. Chemicals in rivers create oceanic dead zones. Catches include more and more commercially unusable fish. And (I really wish I could track down this factoid) I think I remember reading that it took approximately 3 pounds of wild fish to produce 1 pound of aquacultured fish (the fish have to eat something.)

Quite a few of the science fiction stories I read either stated or implied that, in the future, Earth's huge population would draw a large portion of its sustenance from the oceans. It appears that those stories will quickly become as dated as much of Jules Verne's works — still enjoyable, but out of step with contemporary knowledge.

This was first apparently published in the Journal of Science. I wouldn't mind reading the original article or white papers, if anyone can find the links.)

Keywords: | responsibility | ecology |
Posted by Laughing Muse • 444 views • Share this linkNewerOlder

1 of 1 pages

home
Title Deleted for Security Reasons

ColophonProfileKeywords/Tag CloudContactSyndicate (Atom)

Get password   Register   [Why?]
Citizens

User:

Pass:

Remember me
Show my status

Random Quote [??]

If there's monetary gain involved, it isn't god.

Mission Logs

<< January 2009 >>
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Search


Advanced Search

Dossier

Clearance Levels

Notes from All Over


Weather

Current Distractions

Watching

Product
Babylon 5 Season 1


Product
Gladiator

Reading

Product
Ye Gods

Listening

Product
Blade Runner

Reviews

Product
read my review
Product
read my review

read my review

Other Sites