One view of the beginning of the end of that whole dot-com thingamajig.
May 02, 2001
Ah, well, the bubble had to burst sooner or later. The company let go 100 people today, 10 of them from this office. That sounds small…until you consider that we have about 50 people -=at=- this office.
Sorry. Make that “about 40” now.
There are times when I really like contract work. I can ignore office politics; I get more take-home pay; the benefits at this recruitment firm are rather competitive; and I live with my head on the chopping block, so having a contract terminated isn’t the traumatic affair that losing one’s regular/permanent employment is. I’ve become rather blase about the entire thing. It’s pretty normal now.
Still, it sucks. H.‘s birthday was two days ago. How nasty is that? Hi, you’ve just had another birthday (which H. made something of a big deal out of), now you’re fired. Have a nice day.
The weather’;s nice today, but I’ll bet that it’s wasted on H. and the other nine people who just got axed.
Permalink
Bad Flash!! No, wait: good Flash!! Er, ma-aaauuuugh!!!!!!!!!
May 01, 2001
- ZDNet News article - Flash: Easy target for gaudy graphics
- Egregious design idiocy. Bandwidth drunkenness. Flash is taking it on the chin again — or, more appropriately, the designers who (over)use Flash are being publicly keelhauled. We've all seen sites done using Flash. The ubiquitous splash pages (which good ol'; Microsoft started, rot their raddled sourcecode), the online movies, games, and just plain weird things. Flash can be used well — like in the NFL's web site, where their navigation is a quick-loading Flash file — but too often we're forced to wade through poor uses of the tool just to get to a small nugget of information.
There is no “Flash vs. usability” war. There is a “bad use of Flash vs. usability” battle, much in the same way that there is a “bad HTML coding vs. accessibility” battle. What sites have you seen that make good use of Flash? What do you consider good use of Flash? Add your opinions and links that display what you think is a good use of Flash or Shockwave. I personally loathe the track record of Flash usage online, but there are sites that use it well (yes, Virginia, even in movie form).
So before some kind of senseless boom slams down...why not educate everyone? Both designers and site users alike? Otherwise, Flash will shortly go the way of frames: everyone is afraid to use it because it has such a bad rap. It would be shameful to let this kind of potential be squandered.
Permalink
Governments trying to stop spam is like...governments trying to be efficient.
Apr 30, 2001
Spam. Mass-market advert blitz email shuttled directly into your mailbox. I hate it. You hate it. We all hate it.
Okay, except for maybe that one weirdo in Whoville who also, coincidentally, has a complete set of every catalogue ever sent out by Lillian Vernon™.
Would you believe that the US government is once again trying to do something about it? While that’s very admirable (actually they’re just putting on a show to pacify their grumpiest constituents), I think it will work about as well as gun control laws do at keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals. A completely new approach is called for here.
Permalink
Gentlefolk, get on your soapboxes.
Apr 26, 2001
My favourite thing about the Internet is that ever since I started using it — I hopped on USENet, back in 1986 — I was instantly empowered to make my contribution. Posts to newsgroups. A reply on a BBS. Then a web page, the ubiquitous guest book signings, and then my own web site full of whatever I wanted to say, whenever I wanted to say it.
Radio, television, and the printed word may reach lots of people (sometimes), but those industries got their paradigms set decades ago. To be on television or radio, or to print a book or even a pamphlet, you had to have money, connections, and some modicum of talent. You could also be given a gag order by the commercial PTBs: we don’t want to publish your book/give you airtime/hear what you have to say. Go sit down and be a good little consumer. Sure, things like public radio and vanity presses (and in the 1990s, public-access cable) let more people come to the party. But even then, there was more of an initial investment — usually in money, which is nice to have for those pesky things like rent and food. On the Internet, anyone can sign up for a free site and publish nearly any kind of web content they want — and unless they break some local or federal law, no one can shut them up.
Sure there may be a lot of crap out there. Some may argue that this site is a steaming example thereof. But I get to talk about whatever I want, whenever I want…and people get to read it whenever they want. They don’t have to buy a book or tune in at a particular time. They can take a break in the middle and get a coffee — or repaint a room in the house. They can read while naked (and if that’s the case, pleaseandthankyou, I really don’t care for details. If you’re not so good looking, it’ll just annoy me. If you’re good looking, it’ll just frustrate me. Neither is particularly delightsome.)
Rail all you want. Decry the gradual lowering of content standards. Get really bored with this site and fire off an angry missive. Then go back to your own site, with your own journal, and rant about how unutterably stupid, how quelle pathetique, this laughing muse person is…
...because I’m not shutting up any time soon. I hope you don’t, either.
Permalink
CSS design repositories help folks transition from using tables as layout tools. Or, in other words, steal this code.
Apr 25, 2001
- Glish's CSS Layout Repository
CSS3 hints at giving designers wrapping, fluid multicolumnar control, which is very cool. However, in the meantime, CSS does offer a way for you to produce those multicolumnar layouts without having to use TABLE codes and bloat your page to Hecate and back. Check out this CSS layout resource including tutorials, visible source code, and goodies galore.
- CSS Layout Reservoir
Another excellent CSS resource, from Blue Robot.
Permalink
The name is...what?!??
Apr 24, 2001
In the latest foofaraw with the incident between the Americans and the Chinese — the plane collision, the demand for an apology, that whole kerfuffle — it has been alleged that the Chinese pilot was hotdogging, and turned too close to the American craft — thus causing the collision and his own death.
It’s grimly amusing, then, that his name was Wang Wei (pronounced Wong Way).
Permalink
89 of 92 pages « First < 87 88 89 90 91 > Last »